This engagement is anonymized to protect client confidentiality. Clarity Tax & CPAs is a PCAOB-registered, peer-reviewed firm.
Client Snapshot
- Industry
- Nonprofit, youth education & workforce development
- Size
- Roughly $2.1M in annual revenue; foundation grants and government contracts
- Location
- West Coast (anonymized)
- Engagement type
- GAAS financial statement audit under FASB ASC 958 (nonprofit entities)
The Challenge
A youth-focused workforce development nonprofit had grown rapidly through foundation grants and city contracts, but its accounting infrastructure had not kept pace. Its prior CPA, a generalist with limited nonprofit experience, had been issuing audit reports that classified virtually all grant revenue as revenue with donor restrictions, regardless of the actual restriction terms. Several major grants were general operating support with no programmatic restrictions, and at least one multi-year grant had been entirely misclassified.
The misclassification made the organization's net assets appear predominantly restricted on the balance sheet, which led two prospective funders to decline funding over perceived liquidity concerns, when in fact the organization had adequate unrestricted reserves. The board's finance committee flagged the issue after an AICPA nonprofit financial reporting webinar and came to Clarity for a second opinion before the next audit cycle.
What We Did
- Reviewed all active grant agreements and gift documentation against ASC 958-605 guidance on conditional versus unconditional contributions and donor-imposed restrictions versus board designations.
- Identified $387,000 in net assets that had been classified as with donor restrictions but were in fact without donor restrictions, either general operating support grants or funds where the restriction had already been met and the release had not been recorded.
- Corrected the net asset classification in the current-year audit and disclosed the prior-year reclassification in the comparative financial statements, with explanatory footnote language drafted to help funders and board members understand the change.
- Issued an unmodified audit opinion. Included a liquidity and availability note disclosing the organization's financial assets available for general expenditure within one year, a disclosure that directly addressed the funder concern behind the prior declined applications.
- Provided the executive director with a plain-language summary of the net asset classification framework and a template for evaluating new grant awards going forward, reducing the likelihood of recurrence.
The Outcome
Both funders who had previously declined reopened conversations after receiving the corrected financials. One made a $75,000 general operating grant within 90 days of audit delivery. The finance committee adopted a formal grant classification policy as a direct result of the engagement. The executive director noted that the corrected statements changed how the board discussed financial health at quarterly meetings: for the first time, they could clearly see the distinction between available operating reserves and restricted program funds.
Learn more about our financial statement audit services, or compare an audit, review, and compilation.